CS
Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (CGBD)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was steady but softer: NII per share was $0.40 (Adjusted NII $0.41) as lower base rates, tighter spreads, and a modest uptick in non-accruals weighed on earnings; total investment income (TII) was $54.864M, and NAV/share declined 1.0% q/q to $16.63 . Versus S&P Global consensus, EPS of $0.40 was below $0.43* and TII of $54.864M was below $55.5M* (small misses) [functions.GetEstimates].
- Strategic scale-up: Closed the CSL III merger (Mar 27), issuing ~18.9M shares and adding ~$485.7M FV of assets; Carlyle exchanged its preferred into 3.0M common at NAV and covered $5M of merger costs, eliminating a dilutive overhang and lowering expense drag . Portfolio FV rose to $2.246B and statutory leverage was 1.04x; liquidity was $858.5M (cash + undrawn) as of 3/31/25 .
- Dividend and outlook: Base dividend of $0.40 was declared for Q2 2025; management expects Q2 NII/share to be “in the same range as Q1,” supported by $0.85/share spillover income built over five years .
- Risk and catalysts: Non-accruals increased to 1.6% of FV (2.2% cost) vs 0.6% prior quarter; management sees minimal direct tariff exposure (<5% of portfolio) but continued tight spreads as a headwind—execution on originations and JV optimization are near-term catalysts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Closed CSL III merger and removed dilution: “The merger increased our scale and eliminated the CGBD preferred stock dilution overhang…Carlyle provided $5 million of merger-related expense coverage” . Equity-for-preferred exchange converted into 3.0M common at NAV, removing the 12/31/24 $8.87 conversion overhang .
- Strengthened capital structure and liquidity: Upsized the credit facility by $145M to $935M (maturity to 2030) and established an ATM for up to $150M of equity, ending with $858.5M total liquidity at 3/31/25 .
- Portfolio scale and seniority improved: Portfolio FV grew to $2.246B; first-lien mix rose to 83.4%, and senior secured exposure was 94.4% post-merger, supporting credit positioning .
What Went Wrong
- Earnings pressure from rates/spreads and non-accruals: EPS (NII/share) fell to $0.40 from $0.47 in Q4 2024 as lower base rates, tight spreads, and a modest uptick in non-accruals weighed on results; non-accruals rose to 1.6% FV and 2.2% cost (from 0.6% and 1.0%) .
- Small misses vs consensus: Q1 EPS of $0.40 trailed the $0.43* consensus; TII of $54.864M missed the $55.5M* consensus as yields compressed and JV dividends normalized from Q4’s elevated level [functions.GetEstimates] .
- YoY top-line and margin compression: TII declined vs Q1 2024 ($54.864M vs $62.007M), and NII margin contracted with higher interest expense from a larger average debt balance and lower average portfolio yields .
Financial Results
Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global consensus)
Values marked with * are from S&P Global consensus (Values retrieved from S&P Global).
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Portfolio Mix by Asset Type (% FV)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO (prepared remarks): “We generated GAAP net investment income of $0.40 per share and adjusted net investment income of $0.41 per share… While sponsor M&A activity was muted, CGBD added ~$180 million in organic originations… we see minimal potential direct risk from tariffs… spreads remain near historically tight levels, presenting a potential headwind to near-term earnings” .
- CFO: “Total investment income was $55 million, generally in line with prior quarter due to a higher average portfolio balance, offset by lower weighted average yields and lower JV dividends… GAAP NII was $0.40 per share; adjusted $0.41… we expect Q2 earnings power of the combined portfolio with NII per share in the same range as Q1” .
- Strategic/capital: “In March, we upsized and extended our primary revolver to $935 million… Carlyle exchanged its preferred stock for common at NAV… and provided $5 million of expense coverage. We also set up an ATM equity program for incremental dry powder” .
Q&A Highlights
- JV/ROE trajectory: Management expects JV dividend contribution to be roughly flat near term on a lower capital base but with higher ROE; structure resembles a bank-like facility with CLO-like tests to achieve attractive pricing .
- Asset rotation post-merger: CSL III’s book is 99% first lien and slightly lower yielding; combined yield impact about −15 bps; plan to rotate lower-spread assets into the JV to improve returns .
- Leverage path: Targeting a return to the preferred leverage zone over the next ~two quarters, supported by strong Q2 originations pipeline and slower repayments .
- Dividend durability and spillover: Management highlighted $0.85/share spillover income and multiple levers (JV ramp, potential spread normalization), while acknowledging SOFR path as a headwind; intention is to maintain the base dividend .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus for Q1 2025: EPS $0.43* (3 est.) vs actual $0.40; TII $55.5M* (2 est.) vs actual $54.864M—both modest misses, driven by yield compression, lower base rates, and higher interest expense on a larger average debt balance [functions.GetEstimates] . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Implications: Near-term estimate risk is modestly negative if base rates drift lower and spreads stay tight; however, management’s expectation for Q2 NII/share to remain in the Q1 range and portfolio scale/capital flexibility may stabilize revisions .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term earnings resilience, but modest pressure: NII/share at $0.40 with mgmt guiding Q2 in-range; watch rate/spread dynamics and non‑accruals (1.6% FV) for incremental pressure or relief .
- Scale and mix are improved: Post-merger portfolio is larger ($2.246B FV) and more first-lien/senior-secured (83%/94%), supportive of downside protection .
- Balance sheet optionality: $935M revolver, ATM program, and $858.5M liquidity give capacity to lean into originations and rotate assets/JV to defend NII/share .
- Dividend appears supported: Base dividend maintained at $0.40 with $0.85/share spillover as a cushion; absence of supplemental for Q2 reflects prudent stance amid spread/rate headwinds .
- Watch the catalysts: Execution on asset rotation to JV, originations ramp in Q2, and any broadening of spreads could support earnings; further non‑accrual migration or faster rate cuts would be the key risks .